Difference between revisions of "Talk:0.2 - Scare Tactics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Why can't it be both retired and active? We clearly aren't going to be using it anymore, the only reason it's still in there was because of some oversight when we were making the sets. For all intents and purposes, it is retired. However it's also just a question of semantics, so I guess it doesn't really matter how it's categorized. [[User:Trick trickster|Trick trickster]] 14:51, October 4, 2007 (EDT) | :Why can't it be both retired and active? We clearly aren't going to be using it anymore, the only reason it's still in there was because of some oversight when we were making the sets. For all intents and purposes, it is retired. However it's also just a question of semantics, so I guess it doesn't really matter how it's categorized. [[User:Trick trickster|Trick trickster]] 14:51, October 4, 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I'm lazy enough to let it be both. I was just checking whether anyone else had opinions on the matter. [[User:Bickfa|Bickfa]] 18:28, October 4, 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:28, October 4, 2007
Can this song really be both retired and active? Bickfa 14:23, October 4, 2007 (EDT)
- I originally called it retired because I thought that we'd take it out once we took the songs we needed. I guess we didn't. HLPXX 14:41, October 4, 2007 (EDT)
- Why can't it be both retired and active? We clearly aren't going to be using it anymore, the only reason it's still in there was because of some oversight when we were making the sets. For all intents and purposes, it is retired. However it's also just a question of semantics, so I guess it doesn't really matter how it's categorized. Trick trickster 14:51, October 4, 2007 (EDT)
- I'm lazy enough to let it be both. I was just checking whether anyone else had opinions on the matter. Bickfa 18:28, October 4, 2007 (EDT)