Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Active Songs (2003-2006)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:So, would this be a recurring thing, where there will be Category:Active Songs (2006-2007), Category:Active Songs (2007-2008), and so on? If this is the eventual plan, I see certain songs (Carry On comes to mind) being in waaaay too many categories. Just my $0.02 [[User:HLPXX|HLPXX]] 00:37, May 1, 2007 (EDT) | :So, would this be a recurring thing, where there will be Category:Active Songs (2006-2007), Category:Active Songs (2007-2008), and so on? If this is the eventual plan, I see certain songs (Carry On comes to mind) being in waaaay too many categories. Just my $0.02 [[User:HLPXX|HLPXX]] 00:37, May 1, 2007 (EDT) | ||
::Well I was figuring we'd only make a new category for major overhauls of the active set. Unless there's a really easy way to categorize each song with a range of years so that the active set can be searched year by year without having all of the separate categories that this system would require. But I doubt there is anything that easy. [[User:Trick trickster|Trick trickster]] 00:44, May 1, 2007 (EDT) | ::Well I was figuring we'd only make a new category for major overhauls of the active set. Unless there's a really easy way to categorize each song with a range of years so that the active set can be searched year by year without having all of the separate categories that this system would require. But I doubt there is anything that easy. [[User:Trick trickster|Trick trickster]] 00:44, May 1, 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::Maybe not so much categorizing each song, but you could make a page titled "Active set 2003-06" or something, with links to each song in that set. I imagine it's about the same amount of work, only this way, the link goes both ways. As long as it's only for major overhauls, it sounds like a good idea to me. We get to see the evolution of the active set. [[User:HLPXX|HLPXX]] 00:58, May 1, 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:58, April 30, 2007
Before I touch this any more, I want to make sure that everyone thinks it's a good idea. Also, if anyone can come up with a better description (shouldn't be too hard), go for it. Trick trickster 00:31, May 1, 2007 (EDT)
- So, would this be a recurring thing, where there will be Category:Active Songs (2006-2007), Category:Active Songs (2007-2008), and so on? If this is the eventual plan, I see certain songs (Carry On comes to mind) being in waaaay too many categories. Just my $0.02 HLPXX 00:37, May 1, 2007 (EDT)
- Well I was figuring we'd only make a new category for major overhauls of the active set. Unless there's a really easy way to categorize each song with a range of years so that the active set can be searched year by year without having all of the separate categories that this system would require. But I doubt there is anything that easy. Trick trickster 00:44, May 1, 2007 (EDT)
- Maybe not so much categorizing each song, but you could make a page titled "Active set 2003-06" or something, with links to each song in that set. I imagine it's about the same amount of work, only this way, the link goes both ways. As long as it's only for major overhauls, it sounds like a good idea to me. We get to see the evolution of the active set. HLPXX 00:58, May 1, 2007 (EDT)
- Well I was figuring we'd only make a new category for major overhauls of the active set. Unless there's a really easy way to categorize each song with a range of years so that the active set can be searched year by year without having all of the separate categories that this system would require. But I doubt there is anything that easy. Trick trickster 00:44, May 1, 2007 (EDT)