Talk:Quotes
I still maintain that I didn't say that, but whatever. Trick trickster 16:29, February 9, 2007 (EST)
At some point we're going to want to divide this page up more....maybe by season? I haven't really thought about it much, but something will need to be done soon. It's getting pretty cluttered. Trick trickster 23:28, March 7, 2007 (EST)
Regarding the quote
"Where's your messiah now?" - Unknown, at an RPI/Sacred Heart Game
I think that was Rob Trics. Anyone want to second this guess? -Rockchops 01:15, May 6, 2007 (EDT)
- It was probably either him or Tim Fill. Bickfa 13:55, May 6, 2007 (EDT)
Is anyone else thinking that we don't really need to add years into the quotes page? Bickfa 15:41, October 22, 2007 (EDT)
- I don't see any real harm in it, they should probably be separated somehow Trick trickster 15:56, October 22, 2007 (EDT)
- I guess my previous comment stems from a desire to make the page less user friendly. I'll go through and double check the year's which are already in place. Bickfa 16:01, October 22, 2007 (EDT)
"Damnit. I got up and Chris and Natalie took my seat." - Leah Glover
"Eh, just sit on one of them. Either way, only one will care." - James Lauser
Is this even a quote or just a snippet of conversation between two people? Did anyone else even hear this? Trick trickster 01:19, November 4, 2007 (EST)
- I guess it's really just a snippet of a conversation... But it's still funny. James 08:17, November 4, 2007 (EST)
- Funny or not, I think it's unnecessary. It's pretty ridiculous when people are updating the wiki an hour after something's said. I think a good indicator on whether something should be included on the quotes page is if someone remembers that it happened after the fact, especially if it's not by the person that said the quote. Does anyone else agree with this? Trick trickster 15:21, November 5, 2007 (EST)
- I'm inclined to agree with this - it seems that anything even remotely interesting or humorous is getting added and we've completely exploded the quotes page in the past year with all kinds of random things. I'd be fine with the idea of waiting a while before deciding if something's worth adding. If it is it'll be remembered. Gary 16:00, November 5, 2007 (EST)
- Yeah, I see the logic here. I'll take it out. James 16:11, November 5, 2007 (EST)
- I'm inclined to agree with this - it seems that anything even remotely interesting or humorous is getting added and we've completely exploded the quotes page in the past year with all kinds of random things. I'd be fine with the idea of waiting a while before deciding if something's worth adding. If it is it'll be remembered. Gary 16:00, November 5, 2007 (EST)
- Funny or not, I think it's unnecessary. It's pretty ridiculous when people are updating the wiki an hour after something's said. I think a good indicator on whether something should be included on the quotes page is if someone remembers that it happened after the fact, especially if it's not by the person that said the quote. Does anyone else agree with this? Trick trickster 15:21, November 5, 2007 (EST)