Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Bickford"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:But James, I was looking forward to that challenge! [[User:semczukn|semczukn]] 17:32, February 25, 2008 (EST) | :But James, I was looking forward to that challenge! [[User:semczukn|semczukn]] 17:32, February 25, 2008 (EST) | ||
::Go for it. I still maintain that you probably shouldn't, though. [[User:James|James]] 17:55, February 25, 2008 (EST) | ::Go for it. I still maintain that you probably shouldn't, though. [[User:James|James]] 17:55, February 25, 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :::Seconded, James. Seconded wholeheartedly. [[User:Trick trickster|Trick trickster]] 17:58, February 25, 2008 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:58, February 25, 2008
If being a bitter ex-manager is one of the responsibilities, I'm pretty sure that I haven't been filling this role since 2002 (it's probably more like 2007). Bickfa 22:16, February 18, 2008 (EST)
Who else could possibly fill this role after Bickford? Gary has 1, 2, and 7 down... 3 isn't hard... 5 is probably likely. But I really don't see 4 or 6 happening any time soon. And sorry Natalie, but I really don't think you should grow a goatee... James 23:47, February 20, 2008 (EST)
- But James, I was looking forward to that challenge! semczukn 17:32, February 25, 2008 (EST)
- Go for it. I still maintain that you probably shouldn't, though. James 17:55, February 25, 2008 (EST)
- Seconded, James. Seconded wholeheartedly. Trick trickster 17:58, February 25, 2008 (EST)
- Go for it. I still maintain that you probably shouldn't, though. James 17:55, February 25, 2008 (EST)